header-logo header-logo

21 June 2023
Issue: 8030 / Categories: Legal News , Contempt , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Johnson support fades following Privileges Committee report

MPs have voted 354-7 to back the Privileges Committee’s final report that former prime minister Boris Johnson committed five contempts of parliament.

In a blistering debate, the committee’s chair Harriet Harman said: ‘Johnson’s dishonesty, if left unchecked, would have contaminated the whole of government’. A handful of Conservatives defended Johnson but later abstained. Eight Cabinet members backed the report, including the Lord Chancellor, Alex Chalk. Leader of the Commons Penny Mordaunt, speaking in the debate, said she believed Johnson had misled parliament.

Due to Johnson’s resignation last week, the committee’s recommended sanction of 90 days—increased after Johnson called the committee a ‘kangaroo court’— cannot be enforced. However, Johnson may be blocked from receiving an ex-MPs’ pass to the parliamentary estate.

The year-long inquiry assessed whether Johnson deliberately misled the House about gatherings in 10 Downing Street during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Issue: 8030 / Categories: Legal News , Contempt , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll