header-logo header-logo

20 November 2014
Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Jonathan Segal—Fox Williams

Fintech & alternative finance specialist joins firm as partner

Fox Williams LLP has appointed fintech and alternative finance specialist Jonathan Segal as a partner to bolster the firm’s established fintech offering. Jonathan joins Fox Williams from Wragge Lawrence Graham where he was head of fintech.   

Jonathan advises clients across the fintech and alternative finance spectrum, from start-ups disrupting existing markets with innovative technology to established financial institutions looking to invest in new technology. 

He has particular expertise in peer-to-peer lending and crowdfunding platforms, drawing on his  vast experience in the banking and finance sector gained both in-house at major financial institutions and in private practice. Representative matters include advising an SME lending platform and a consumer lending platform on setting up their operations, a peer-to-peer car insurance platform on their funding requirements and Investec Bank on a new margin lending product to help grow its market share of high net worth clients. 

Jonathan says: “Fox Williams is particularly well-placed to provide fintech legal services because of the team’s focus on the technology, media and digital and financial services sectors and the deep knowledge they can apply to the issues facing fintech clients. I’m delighted to be adding to the team’s expertise and look forward to growing our client-base as the fintech sector continues to evolve.” 

Paul Osborne, Fox Williams’ senior partner, says: “Jonathan is a leading practitioner in the fields of fintech and alternative finance and represents an important strategic hire for our dedicated fintech team. The City is going through its next stage of evolution as fast growing fintech companies emerge and established financial services providers increasingly embrace online strategies to interact with their customers.  Fox Williams is responding to these changing client needs and we sit at the heart of the innovation taking place at Tech City and Silicon Roundabout in London. We are excited to welcome Jonathan to the firm and by the opportunities we see ahead.”                              

Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll