header-logo header-logo

13 June 2014
Issue: 7610 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Judge

R (on the application of Jones) v Judicial Appointments Commission [2014] EWHC 1680 (Admin), [2014] All ER (D) 19 (Jun)

The Judicial Appointments Commission was entitled to take the view that public confidence in the standards of the judiciary would not be maintained if persons who were appointed to judicial office had committed motoring offences resulting in penalty points at the level identified in the Commission’s policy within four years of their appointment.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll