header-logo header-logo

25 January 2007 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Judge not that ye be not judged

Geoffrey Bindman’s judicial potential is tested over the
fate of a four-poster bed

In other European countries the judiciary has a distinct career path which lawyers can choose to follow at an early age. In Britain judges are still largely recruited from practitioners. At lower levels, increasingly those who want to judge must fill out application forms and submit themselves to a selection process. Some of my younger colleagues have done this successfully and enjoy their judging whether they do it full time or as a part-time diversion from the stresses of practice.

I admire those who can switch from legal practitioner to judge. The difference between the two roles is often underestimated. Though, of course, lawyers acting for clients must be responsible and honourable—solicitors, after all, are officers of the court—partisanship is the essence of advocacy. The judge by contrast has to be balanced, objective, and impartial. Many judges have all these qualities and they manage the transition to the bench seamlessly. Others—and I could mention a few

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll