header-logo header-logo

25 January 2007 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Judge not that ye be not judged

Geoffrey Bindman’s judicial potential is tested over the
fate of a four-poster bed

In other European countries the judiciary has a distinct career path which lawyers can choose to follow at an early age. In Britain judges are still largely recruited from practitioners. At lower levels, increasingly those who want to judge must fill out application forms and submit themselves to a selection process. Some of my younger colleagues have done this successfully and enjoy their judging whether they do it full time or as a part-time diversion from the stresses of practice.

I admire those who can switch from legal practitioner to judge. The difference between the two roles is often underestimated. Though, of course, lawyers acting for clients must be responsible and honourable—solicitors, after all, are officers of the court—partisanship is the essence of advocacy. The judge by contrast has to be balanced, objective, and impartial. Many judges have all these qualities and they manage the transition to the bench seamlessly. Others—and I could mention a few

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll