header-logo header-logo

Judge not that ye be not judged

25 January 2007 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Geoffrey Bindman’s judicial potential is tested over the
fate of a four-poster bed

In other European countries the judiciary has a distinct career path which lawyers can choose to follow at an early age. In Britain judges are still largely recruited from practitioners. At lower levels, increasingly those who want to judge must fill out application forms and submit themselves to a selection process. Some of my younger colleagues have done this successfully and enjoy their judging whether they do it full time or as a part-time diversion from the stresses of practice.

I admire those who can switch from legal practitioner to judge. The difference between the two roles is often underestimated. Though, of course, lawyers acting for clients must be responsible and honourable—solicitors, after all, are officers of the court—partisanship is the essence of advocacy. The judge by contrast has to be balanced, objective, and impartial. Many judges have all these qualities and they manage the transition to the bench seamlessly. Others—and I could mention a few

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll