header-logo header-logo

13 February 2015
Issue: 7641 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judges' concern over increasingly difficult job

An in-depth survey of salaried judges has revealed widespread concern that the job is getting harder each year.

The Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB), which recommends appropriate pay to the government for senior public service positions, suggested last year that a survey would help them prepare their 2015 report. All salaried judges in courts and non-devolved tribunals across the UK were invited to fill in a questionnaire in October 2014. 

The 2014 UK Judicial Attitude Survey, carried out by University College London (UCL), found that 86% of judges who have been in post for at least five years felt working conditions are worse now than they were five years ago. The courts judiciary in England and Wales reported a greater deterioration in working conditions than UK tribunal judges, and the view was held most strongly by judges in certain posts—94% of Circuit Judges; 91% of District Judges; and 85% of Justices of Appeal.

Nearly half—46%—of courts judiciary in England and Wales said their caseload over the last year was too high, compared with 27% of UK tribunal judges.

Half of the courts judiciary rated IT equipment in courts as “poor”. Almost two-thirds (65%) of judges report low morale among court staff, and more than three-quarters describe the amount of administrative support as “poor” or “inadequate”.

The majority of judges described as “poor” or “inadequate” career progression (63%), opportunities for sitting in other jurisdictions (62%) and flexible working (59%).

However, the vast majority of judges were clearly satisfied with the challenge of the job, variety of work, and quality of training.

Almost half of all District, Circuit and Employment Judges said they would consider pursuing additional income through out of court work if this option existed. However, Justices of Appeal (16%), Upper Tribunal judges (22%) and High Court judges (27%) were notably less keen.

In a joint statement, the Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas and the Senior President of Tribunals Lord Justice Sullivan said: “The survey shows that many judges are feeling, in common with millions of other people, that their work has become harder year after year in many ways. Even though they know they are well paid compared to most people, they, like many others, have seen their pay drop in real terms.

“The survey also shows that judges do not carry out the work solely for the money. Their work is rewarding, but also demanding—confronting significant human suffering, loss and family breakdowns or untangling business transactions with livelihoods and businesses at stake. Judges are dedicated to their role, working harder and longer to keep standards high. Investment which has been promised to give judges modern IT will help.”

 

Issue: 7641 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll