header-logo header-logo

Judges face fashion make over

19 July 2007
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

News

Plans to reform judicial court working dress in England and Wales have been announced by the lord chief justice, Lord Phillips.
From 1 January 2008, wigs, wing collars and bands will become a thing of the past for judges sitting in open court in civil and family proceedings. Phillips has made it clear that he expects barristers to throw off such accoutrements too.

The Bar Council immediately launched a consultation among its members. Bar chairman, Geoffrey Vos QC, warns that court dress has always been a sensitive matter, upon which there are “widely divergent views”.
In the criminal courts, barristers and judges will be allowed to keep their trimmings, although High Court judges will be restricted to a single set of robes—those they currently wear in winter—for criminal proceedings throughout the year.

In civil and family proceedings, the circuit bench will continue to wear the same gown while all other judges will wear a new, simple, gown which is currently being designed.

Phillips says that, although the one-off cost of the new civil gown will be around £200,000, the move will save about £300,000 a year thereafter.

Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll