header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Judges face fashion make over

News

Plans to reform judicial court working dress in England and Wales have been announced by the lord chief justice, Lord Phillips.
From 1 January 2008, wigs, wing collars and bands will become a thing of the past for judges sitting in open court in civil and family proceedings. Phillips has made it clear that he expects barristers to throw off such accoutrements too.

The Bar Council immediately launched a consultation among its members. Bar chairman, Geoffrey Vos QC, warns that court dress has always been a sensitive matter, upon which there are “widely divergent views”.
In the criminal courts, barristers and judges will be allowed to keep their trimmings, although High Court judges will be restricted to a single set of robes—those they currently wear in winter—for criminal proceedings throughout the year.

In civil and family proceedings, the circuit bench will continue to wear the same gown while all other judges will wear a new, simple, gown which is currently being designed.

Phillips says that, although the one-off cost of the new civil gown will be around £200,000, the move will save about £300,000 a year thereafter.

Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll