header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Judges face fashion make over

News

Plans to reform judicial court working dress in England and Wales have been announced by the lord chief justice, Lord Phillips.
From 1 January 2008, wigs, wing collars and bands will become a thing of the past for judges sitting in open court in civil and family proceedings. Phillips has made it clear that he expects barristers to throw off such accoutrements too.

The Bar Council immediately launched a consultation among its members. Bar chairman, Geoffrey Vos QC, warns that court dress has always been a sensitive matter, upon which there are “widely divergent views”.
In the criminal courts, barristers and judges will be allowed to keep their trimmings, although High Court judges will be restricted to a single set of robes—those they currently wear in winter—for criminal proceedings throughout the year.

In civil and family proceedings, the circuit bench will continue to wear the same gown while all other judges will wear a new, simple, gown which is currently being designed.

Phillips says that, although the one-off cost of the new civil gown will be around £200,000, the move will save about £300,000 a year thereafter.

Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll