header-logo header-logo

Judges needed to clear backlog

15 May 2019
Issue: 7840 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

A lack of full-time judges has forced employment tribunals to rush in part-time judges to try to clear a growing backlog of cases.

Ministry of Justice (MoJ) figures show the payroll for part-time judges at employment tribunals rose 71% from £3.9m in 2016–17 to £6.6m in 2017–18. Meanwhile, the backlog of outstanding cases increased from 16,800 in the fourth quarter of 2017 to 25,600 in the same quarter in 2018.

One reason for the increase in cases is the abolition of tribunal fees in July 2017, after the Supreme Court ruled them unlawful.

According to recent research conducted by employment law firm GQ|Littler, average waiting times between the tribunal receiving a claim and hearing it was 207 days in 2017–18. The MoJ is currently seeking to recruit more than 50 full-time employment judges, to add to its roster of about 80 full-time and 1,180 part-time judges.

Raoul Parekh, partner at GQ|Littler, said hiring more part-time judges ‘will not help reduce the backlog in complex cases, such as discrimination’.

Issue: 7840 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll