header-logo header-logo

Judges’ pay

25 June 2014
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has issued an update on judges’ pensions following the case of O’Brien v MoJ [2013] UKSC 6, and Miller v MoJ at the employment tribunal in January.

It will implement a fee-paid Judicial Pension Scheme (JPS) for fee-paid service from 7 April 2000 to 31 March 2015 for eligible fee-paid judicial office holders, as described in the Miller judgment. The scheme will mirror the current Judicial Pensions & Retirement Act scheme. 

Fee-paid judicial office holders will qualify for the scheme from 7 April 2000, although that date is subject to appeal and may change.

The new JPS 2015, due to begin on 1 April 2015, will apply to fee-paid and salaried judicial office holders. A 12-week consultation on its regulations began on 17 June 2014 and ends on 8 September. The MoJ has urged all affected parties to view the consultation.

 

Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll