header-logo header-logo

21 January 2016
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judges’ pay

High Court judges are to be awarded a pay rise of 3%, compared to just 1% or 0.55% for other members of the judiciary.

The rise was recommended by the Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB), in a letter released by the Ministry of Justice last week. It notes: “The evidence available suggests that there is an emerging problem with recruitment and retention of High Court judges; this proposal aims to mitigate this risk by awarding this group an additional uplift in pay.

“No problems have been identified with recruitment or retention of judges in salary groups 6.2 and 7 and previous reviews conducted by the SSRB have shown that these judges are comparatively well remunerated.”

When taken together, the 0.55% rise compensates for the extra to be given to High Court judges, resulting in an overall average of 1%—in line with Treasury policy.

Issue: 7683 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll