header-logo header-logo

11 February 2010
Issue: 7404 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judges under pressure

Increased family work has placed “great strains” on family judges, the lord chief justice, Lord Judge, has warned.

Increased family work has placed “great strains” on family judges, the lord chief justice, Lord Judge, has warned.

His report, Review of the Administration of Justice in the Courts, published last week, covers matters of importance to judges arising in the 2008-2009 legal year.

Delays caused by “limited resources and mounting delays of Cafcass” are “inevitably increasing and represent cause for concern” he reports.
“Despite the production of the president’s interim guidance in an effort to assist this problem, this trend seems unlikely to be reversed.”
He said there were still concerns about the pressure on the Administrative Court, particularly through the volume of asylum and immigration work which accounts for about two-thirds of all judicial reviews.

However, the burden may be eased by the new administrative courts in Manchester, Cardiff, Leeds and Birmingham. Early indications were encouraging, he said, and cases lodged outside London now accounted for 10% of the court’s work and were increasing.
 

Issue: 7404 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll