header-logo header-logo

19 October 2012 / Charlie Clarke-Jervoise
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

Judicial costs control

Charlie Clarke-Jervoise explores the brave new world of costs management

The recent decision by the senior costs judge, Master Hurst in Henry v News Group Newspapers [2012] EWHC 90218 (Costs), is a useful indicator of how seriously judges are likely to take their duty to manage costs.

Costs budgeting, also known as costs estimating and costs management, was first mooted by Lord Justice Jackson in his preliminary report in May 2009. He identified a peculiarity of litigation, namely that, at the time when costs were being run up, no-one knew who would be paying the bill or how much that bill would be. In his view it was no longer acceptable for questions of costs to be left to the end of litigation—some judicial control on the expenditure of costs during the life of the case had to be introduced as a necessary part of case management. After all, he noted, litigation was often a “project”, which both parties were pursuing for commercial ends. Any

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll