header-logo header-logo

19 October 2012 / Charlie Clarke-Jervoise
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

Judicial costs control

Charlie Clarke-Jervoise explores the brave new world of costs management

The recent decision by the senior costs judge, Master Hurst in Henry v News Group Newspapers [2012] EWHC 90218 (Costs), is a useful indicator of how seriously judges are likely to take their duty to manage costs.

Costs budgeting, also known as costs estimating and costs management, was first mooted by Lord Justice Jackson in his preliminary report in May 2009. He identified a peculiarity of litigation, namely that, at the time when costs were being run up, no-one knew who would be paying the bill or how much that bill would be. In his view it was no longer acceptable for questions of costs to be left to the end of litigation—some judicial control on the expenditure of costs during the life of the case had to be introduced as a necessary part of case management. After all, he noted, litigation was often a “project”, which both parties were pursuing for commercial ends. Any

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll