header-logo header-logo

28 July 2016
Issue: 7710 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judicial diversity in numbers

One in five Court of Appeal and High Court judges are women, according to judicial diversity statistics published this week.

Eight out of 39 Court of Appeal judges and 22 out of 106 High Court judges are female, as of April 2016. The numbers correspond almost exactly to the previous year. In the courts generally, the percentage of female judges has increased from 25% to 28% in the past year. In tribunals, it remained stable at 45%.

More than half of the 85 court judges under 40 years of age are women, as are 64% of the 56 tribunal judges under 40.

Some 5% of court judges and 9% of tribunal judges identify as Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic. The figures for judges under the age of 40 is slightly higher—8% for courts and 14% for tribunals.

Lord Thomas, the Lord Chief Justice, says: “I believe strongly that it is imperative that we as judges do not sit back and wait for change but are active in improving the diversity of the judiciary.

“It is encouraging that the figures show that the overall percentage of female judges in courts has increased this year from 25% to 28% whilst remaining stable at the more impressive figure of 45% in the tribunals. The percentage of female judges in courts stood at 23% in 2012.

“The judiciary must be truly open to everyone of the requisite ability and we are hopeful that the variety of initiatives being actively pursued—led by the Judicial Diversity Committee of the Judges’ Council—will bring more diversity to the judiciary, more quickly. Our activities have included networking events, outreach (to schools, colleges, universities, lawyers and community groups), judicial work shadowing, mentoring, application workshops and a dedicated support programme.”

Issue: 7710 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll