header-logo header-logo

11 April 2019
Issue: 7836 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Judicial line: 11 April 2019

This week: unlock the interlock—fast; who posts the claim form; costs only interim cash; divorce costs assessments

Final judgment wins

Q Can an interlocutory order be set aside on application after a final judgment which of itself may not be attackable where a set aside would render the final judgment unsustainable?

A No. An application which had this effect would be an abuse of the court’s process as a collateral attack on a final judgment (see, eg, Daniel Terry v BCS Corporate Acceptances Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2422). If an interlocutory order was made without a hearing and close to trial with a CPR 23.10 right to an affected party to apply to set aside or vary within seven days (although such orders are being increasingly made allowing up to six weeks to apply) then it might be that the trial could not proceed until the application had been determined.

‘They’re at the postbox right now’

Q Is it acceptable for the certificate of service of a claim form which has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll