header-logo header-logo

28 March 2013
Issue: 7554 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Judicial review

R (on the application of Hoque) v City of London Magistrates Court and another [2013] All ER (D) 158 (Mar)

It was settled law that it was not the function of the Divisional Court to look for deficiencies in the wording of a search warrant provided that, so far as practicable, the articles for which the search had been authorised had been identified. Further, s 8 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) fulfilled a purpose which was different to that of s 15 of PACE. While s 8 regulated the requirements for jurisdiction to issue a search warrant and s 8(2) permitted a constable only to remove anything for which the search was authorised by the warrant, s 15 required identification in the warrant of articles for which authority had been given. It followed that it was the responsibility of the justice of the peace to ensure the compliance of the warrant with the requirements of s 15.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll