header-logo header-logo

19 March 2015
Issue: 7645 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Judicial rout

Three judges have been removed from office following allegations that they viewed pornographic material on office IT. There is no suggestion that the material viewed by District Judge Timothy Bowles, Immigration Judge Warren Grant, and Deputy District Judge and Recorder Peter Bullock included illegal content. However, the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice concluded that this was an inexcusable misuse of their judicial IT accounts and wholly unacceptable conduct.

A fourth judge, Recorder Andrew Maw has resigned after similar material was found on his IT account. The judges were not linked in any way.(See "An own e-goal?": Chris Bryden & Michael Salter explain why common sense trumps policy in cases involving online misconduct)

 

Issue: 7645 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
New planning fee rises, wider trade union access rights and a service-by-email trap feature in Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
back-to-top-scroll