header-logo header-logo

Judiciary to prioritise clearing backlog of rape cases

06 March 2024
Categories: Legal News , Criminal , In Court
printer mail-detail

Judges are to hear the oldest rape cases first, with the aim of completing all cases started in the Crown Court more than two years ago within the next five months

Under the initiative, announced this week, judges will aim to have 181 trials of people accused of rape against adults or children listed and heard before the end of July 2024. These cases were all sent to the Crown Court on or before 31 December 2021.

Most of the cases are complex, with some awaiting retrial following a first trial and others stalled on previous occasions for a variety of reasons. Some are already listed for later this year, outside of the July timeframe.

Other rape cases will continue to be heard. There are currently more than 3,000 rape cases awaiting trial.

Senior presiding judge Lord Justice Edis said: ‘While such waiting times are rare, it is unacceptable to have this many rape cases still in the system after more than two years, leaving the lives of complainants, witnesses and defendants on hold. 

‘As judges, we are addressing this and prioritising these cases to ensure justice is done with the full support of all agencies involved as we look to address waiting times across the criminal courts.’

The initiative was suggested by the Crown Court Improvement Group, which was set up in 2021 to improve efficiency and performance in the courts.

Criminal Bar Association (CBA) chair Tana Adkin KC backed the initiative and called for further investment in ‘the dedicated workforce who are specially trained in this work’.

Last month, the CBA warned the current crisis in rape and serious sexual offence (RASSO) is set to ‘accelerate exponentially’ due to a shortage of specialist counsel. A CBA survey of its members found 64% of prosecutors intend not to reapply to be on the RASSO list, and 66% of defence counsel no longer want to conduct RASSO cases. Six out of ten respondents cited poor fees as a reason and half pointed to the detrimental impact on their wellbeing.

The CBA highlighted that the average wait for a bailed rape trial to conclude since an alleged offence is about five and a half years, including an 18-month wait on average from charge to trial completion. However, the CBA has had reports of trial dates being set for the end of 2026 for rape offences charged in 2022.

Office for National Statistics figures published in January showed 41% of those reporting rape withdraw from the prosecution before it is complete.

Categories: Legal News , Criminal , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Richard Meers

Arc Pensions Law—Richard Meers

Pensions litigation team announces senior associate hire

Burges Salmon—Neil Demuth

Burges Salmon—Neil Demuth

Firm appoints new chief financial officer

Anthony Collins—Sue Bearman

Anthony Collins—Sue Bearman

Social purpose firm announces director hire plus eight promotions

NEWS
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Human rights lawyers, social justice champion, co-founder of the law firm Bindmans, and NLJ columnist Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC has died at the age of 92 years
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll