header-logo header-logo

Juggling competing priorities at the MoJ

01 June 2017 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services
printer mail-detail
nlj_7748_hynes

Whoever is appointed (or reappointed) as the next Lord Chancellor will have a groaning in-tray, says Steve Hynes

Call this reckless speculation if you like, but the opinion polls are not likely to be so out of kilter with the electorate that we cannot expect a majority conservative government to be returned at the general election. Much less predictable is who will be put in charge at the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) on 9 June. Elizabeth Truss, the current Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary, seems likely to be re-shuffled due to her poor relationship with the senior judiciary. Whoever is appointed (or maybe re-appointed) by the Prime Minister there is a groaning in-tray waiting for them.

Two years ago, Michael Gove, Truss’s predecessor, succeeded in securing £700m in investment to modernise the Civil Courts and Tribunals system. He got a further £270m set aside for the digitisation of the criminal courts. Under Truss the MoJ has commenced the work on transforming the courts system. This includes the establishment of a new online

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll