header-logo header-logo

01 June 2017 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Juggling competing priorities at the MoJ

nlj_7748_hynes

Whoever is appointed (or reappointed) as the next Lord Chancellor will have a groaning in-tray, says Steve Hynes

Call this reckless speculation if you like, but the opinion polls are not likely to be so out of kilter with the electorate that we cannot expect a majority conservative government to be returned at the general election. Much less predictable is who will be put in charge at the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) on 9 June. Elizabeth Truss, the current Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary, seems likely to be re-shuffled due to her poor relationship with the senior judiciary. Whoever is appointed (or maybe re-appointed) by the Prime Minister there is a groaning in-tray waiting for them.

Two years ago, Michael Gove, Truss’s predecessor, succeeded in securing £700m in investment to modernise the Civil Courts and Tribunals system. He got a further £270m set aside for the digitisation of the criminal courts. Under Truss the MoJ has commenced the work on transforming the courts system. This includes the establishment of a new online

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
Lawyers have been asked for their views on proposals to change the penalties for assaulting a police officer
back-to-top-scroll