header-logo header-logo

05 December 2025 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC FAcSS
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Jury trials: the case of the straw man

237728
Professor Graham Zellick KC considers what it means to say there is no right to trial by jury

David Lammy MP, the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice (pictured), is proposing a major reduction in jury trials, and in doing so has adopted the mantra that there is no right to jury trial, which features prominently in Sir Brian Leveson’s recent report on the criminal courts.

Sir Brian, a former President of the Queen’s Bench Division and Lord Justice of Appeal, writes:

‘Most often, the resistance to reforming the right to elect [trial by jury] has centred on whether a defendant has a constitutional “right” to a jury. I make clear my position that there is no… constitutional or common law right to a trial by jury, with the result that there is no basis for this to limit any approach to necessary reform. It is on this premise that I proceed with my subsequent recommendations [on removing and limiting jury trials]’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll