header-logo header-logo

05 December 2025 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC FAcSS
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Jury trials: the case of the straw man

237728
Professor Graham Zellick KC considers what it means to say there is no right to trial by jury

David Lammy MP, the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice (pictured), is proposing a major reduction in jury trials, and in doing so has adopted the mantra that there is no right to jury trial, which features prominently in Sir Brian Leveson’s recent report on the criminal courts.

Sir Brian, a former President of the Queen’s Bench Division and Lord Justice of Appeal, writes:

‘Most often, the resistance to reforming the right to elect [trial by jury] has centred on whether a defendant has a constitutional “right” to a jury. I make clear my position that there is no… constitutional or common law right to a trial by jury, with the result that there is no basis for this to limit any approach to necessary reform. It is on this premise that I proceed with my subsequent recommendations [on removing and limiting jury trials]’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll