header-logo header-logo

Jury trials: the case of the straw man

05 December 2025 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC FAcSS
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
237728
Professor Graham Zellick KC considers what it means to say there is no right to trial by jury

David Lammy MP, the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice (pictured), is proposing a major reduction in jury trials, and in doing so has adopted the mantra that there is no right to jury trial, which features prominently in Sir Brian Leveson’s recent report on the criminal courts.

Sir Brian, a former President of the Queen’s Bench Division and Lord Justice of Appeal, writes:

‘Most often, the resistance to reforming the right to elect [trial by jury] has centred on whether a defendant has a constitutional “right” to a jury. I make clear my position that there is no… constitutional or common law right to a trial by jury, with the result that there is no basis for this to limit any approach to necessary reform. It is on this premise that I proceed with my subsequent recommendations [on removing and limiting jury trials]’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Commercial property and corporate teams expand in Southampton

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Employment firm expands capability with experienced hire

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Housing management and property litigation team bolstered by partner hires

NEWS
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
back-to-top-scroll