header-logo header-logo

Jury trials: the case of the straw man

05 December 2025 / Professor Graham Zellick CBE KC
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
237728
Professor Graham Zellick KC considers what it means to say there is no right to trial by jury

David Lammy MP, the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice (pictured), is proposing a major reduction in jury trials, and in doing so has adopted the mantra that there is no right to jury trial, which features prominently in Sir Brian Leveson’s recent report on the criminal courts.

Sir Brian, a former President of the Queen’s Bench Division and Lord Justice of Appeal, writes:

‘Most often, the resistance to reforming the right to elect [trial by jury] has centred on whether a defendant has a constitutional “right” to a jury. I make clear my position that there is no… constitutional or common law right to a trial by jury, with the result that there is no basis for this to limit any approach to necessary reform. It is on this premise that I proceed with my subsequent recommendations [on removing and limiting jury trials]’ (‘Independent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

Firm elects new senior partner to lead next phase of growth

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Partner appointed head of family and divorce

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Financial and professional risks team expand with dual partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll