header-logo header-logo

Just good friends?

11 February 2010 / Harriet Strevens , Anna Gee
Issue: 7404 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Harriet Strevens & Anna Gee relay the effects & dangers of sham partnerships

The current economic climate has meant a substantial increase in the number of claims made against solicitors and other professionals, especially claims by lenders looking to recover losses incurred due to the fall in the residential property market. Not surprisingly, insurers are looking more closely at coverage issues, especially when faced with a single insured practice against which numerous claims are made, with quantum often running into millions of pounds.

Most lenders will require their panel firms to have two or more partners in the expectation that this will reduce the likelihood of fraud. However, arrangements which may appear to outsiders to be a partnership may simply be two sole practitioners each lending their name to the other’s practice.

Partnership matters

Under the Partnership Act 1890, a partnership is defined as being: a business; carried out by two or more persons in common; and with a view to profit. Historically, there has been much debate as to whether there

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll