header-logo header-logo

Justice ‘short changed’ in overall government spend

06 September 2024
Categories: Legal News , Public , Governance
printer mail-detail
Public funding for justice has fallen by more than one-fifth in 13 years, Bar Council-commissioned research has shown

According to a report published this week, there was a 22.4% decline in real per person terms from 2009/2010 to 2022/2023—while overall government spending increased by 10.1% in real per person terms and the UK economy grew by 11.5% at the same time.

The report, ‘Justice short changed’, concludes funding for justice in England and Wales is 30.4% below where it would be if it had kept pace with UK inflation, population growth and the economy. Had it kept pace, justice would have received an extra £3.5bn in public funds. (To place this in context, total government spending in 2022/2023 was £1,154.9bn.)

Professor Martin Chalkley and Alice Chalkley, the report’s authors, said: ‘By any measure there has been a very substantial reduction in the public funding of justice in England and Wales.

‘That can be expected to have had a substantial impact on both the volume and quality of service that the system delivers.’

For comparison, in 2022/2023, £181 was spent on justice per person (about 0.5% of GDP)—about the same as on overseas aid—while £820 was spent on defence, £1,550 on education and £640 on transport.

Across a variety of sectors, in the years since the last Labour Prime Minister Gordon Brown left 10 Downing Street, public funding has fallen by 7.5% in real per person terms in social security, 18% in education and 11% in public order and safety. However, it has risen by nearly 25% in health (due to a leap during the Covid-19 pandemic), more than 30% in transport, and dropped and subsequently risen to about the same level in defence.  

Bar Council chair Sam Townend KC said: ‘We know the scale of the problem and that, without a change in direction, things will only get worse.

‘With the spending review coming up we are asking the government to rethink the approach to justice spending. The system needs investment now and a restoration of funding for long term sustainability.

‘When justice is short changed, every citizen seeking to vindicate their rights is short changed. We hope the new government recognises this.’

The report updates a 2020 Bar Council report, ‘Small change for justice’.

Categories: Legal News , Public , Governance
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll