header-logo header-logo

Justice in a lockdown

29 April 2020 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail
19881
The pandemic has exposed the acute lack of investment in public services, including our justice system, says Jon Robins

We did not need a pandemic to expose the frailties of our justice system; however, the devastating spread of COVID-19 has left our courts, prisons and wider access to justice community reeling. As of last week, there was a skeleton service of 160 courts open to the public; all jury trials have how now been cancelled; and business in the magistrates’, family and civil courts restricted to urgent work so that the court service can keep ‘the wheels of justice’ turning.

Just because the country is in ‘lockdown’ doesn’t mean that people’s emergency legal needs disappear. The domestic violence charity Refuge reported a 25% increase in calls to the National Domestic Abuse Helpline since lockdown began. One leading family lawyer reported that one of her team spent two-and-a-half hours waiting on the phone to the courts to get an update on two emergency applications for domestic abuse injunctions. ‘We had someone

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll