header-logo header-logo

29 April 2020 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Justice in a lockdown

19881
The pandemic has exposed the acute lack of investment in public services, including our justice system, says Jon Robins

We did not need a pandemic to expose the frailties of our justice system; however, the devastating spread of COVID-19 has left our courts, prisons and wider access to justice community reeling. As of last week, there was a skeleton service of 160 courts open to the public; all jury trials have how now been cancelled; and business in the magistrates’, family and civil courts restricted to urgent work so that the court service can keep ‘the wheels of justice’ turning.

Just because the country is in ‘lockdown’ doesn’t mean that people’s emergency legal needs disappear. The domestic violence charity Refuge reported a 25% increase in calls to the National Domestic Abuse Helpline since lockdown began. One leading family lawyer reported that one of her team spent two-and-a-half hours waiting on the phone to the courts to get an update on two emergency applications for domestic abuse injunctions. ‘We had someone

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll