header-logo header-logo

25 October 2018
Issue: 7814 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

Justices rule on deportations and family

The Supreme Court case has unanimously dismissed four appeals by deportees in cases involving the right to family life.

The four cases were linked together in one judgment, KO v Home Secretary [2018] UKSC 53. The appellants argued that the tribunal should only be concerned with the effect on the child and not with the conduct of the parents when determining whether it is ‘reasonable to expect’ a child to leave or whether the decision is ‘unduly harsh’ on their child. The Home Secretary countered that a balancing exercise is required between the impact on the child and the public interest.

Among the three men, KO was convicted of conspiracy to make false representations. IT supplied Class A drugs and was deported in 2010. NS and two others falsified documents for immigration purposes.

The fourth appellant, 19, came to the UK aged six but whose parents had returned to Sri Lanka. His appeal was dismissed but his case has been sent back to the Upper Tribunal.

Issue: 7814 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll