header-logo header-logo

25 October 2018
Issue: 7814 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

Justices rule on deportations and family

The Supreme Court case has unanimously dismissed four appeals by deportees in cases involving the right to family life.

The four cases were linked together in one judgment, KO v Home Secretary [2018] UKSC 53. The appellants argued that the tribunal should only be concerned with the effect on the child and not with the conduct of the parents when determining whether it is ‘reasonable to expect’ a child to leave or whether the decision is ‘unduly harsh’ on their child. The Home Secretary countered that a balancing exercise is required between the impact on the child and the public interest.

Among the three men, KO was convicted of conspiracy to make false representations. IT supplied Class A drugs and was deported in 2010. NS and two others falsified documents for immigration purposes.

The fourth appellant, 19, came to the UK aged six but whose parents had returned to Sri Lanka. His appeal was dismissed but his case has been sent back to the Upper Tribunal.

Issue: 7814 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll