header-logo header-logo

Justices rule on deportations and family

25 October 2018
Issue: 7814 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

The Supreme Court case has unanimously dismissed four appeals by deportees in cases involving the right to family life.

The four cases were linked together in one judgment, KO v Home Secretary [2018] UKSC 53. The appellants argued that the tribunal should only be concerned with the effect on the child and not with the conduct of the parents when determining whether it is ‘reasonable to expect’ a child to leave or whether the decision is ‘unduly harsh’ on their child. The Home Secretary countered that a balancing exercise is required between the impact on the child and the public interest.

Among the three men, KO was convicted of conspiracy to make false representations. IT supplied Class A drugs and was deported in 2010. NS and two others falsified documents for immigration purposes.

The fourth appellant, 19, came to the UK aged six but whose parents had returned to Sri Lanka. His appeal was dismissed but his case has been sent back to the Upper Tribunal.

Issue: 7814 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll