header-logo header-logo

23 February 2012 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7502 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Property
printer mail-detail

Kaney in action

Chris Pamplin reports on the case of the forgetful surveyor

In 1952, Mr Marshall owned a bungalow and a pig-holding. He wanted to sell the bungalow to James Ladd for £2,500 but was in some difficulty because his local council had ruled that the most he could sell it for was £1,500. After some interesting events—including Ladd putting down a £50 deposit and counting out 10 bundles of £100 in notes on the carpet under the table—Marshall took the property off the market. Litigation loomed as Ladd sought to recover his £1,000.

At the first instance trial, Marshall denied any knowledge of the £1,000 and, with Mrs Marshall suffering from a distinct lack of clarity about what happened that night, Ladd failed to convince the judge of the existence of the transaction. But then the Marshalls fell out, divorced and Mrs Marshall’s memory improved enormously. So it was that Ladd took his claim to the Court of Appeal and gave Denning LJ the opportunity to establish, in Ladd v Marshall [1954] 3 All

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll