header-logo header-logo

23 February 2012 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7502 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Property
printer mail-detail

Kaney in action

Chris Pamplin reports on the case of the forgetful surveyor

In 1952, Mr Marshall owned a bungalow and a pig-holding. He wanted to sell the bungalow to James Ladd for £2,500 but was in some difficulty because his local council had ruled that the most he could sell it for was £1,500. After some interesting events—including Ladd putting down a £50 deposit and counting out 10 bundles of £100 in notes on the carpet under the table—Marshall took the property off the market. Litigation loomed as Ladd sought to recover his £1,000.

At the first instance trial, Marshall denied any knowledge of the £1,000 and, with Mrs Marshall suffering from a distinct lack of clarity about what happened that night, Ladd failed to convince the judge of the existence of the transaction. But then the Marshalls fell out, divorced and Mrs Marshall’s memory improved enormously. So it was that Ladd took his claim to the Court of Appeal and gave Denning LJ the opportunity to establish, in Ladd v Marshall [1954] 3 All

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll