header-logo header-logo

23 February 2012 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7502 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Property
printer mail-detail

Kaney in action

Chris Pamplin reports on the case of the forgetful surveyor

In 1952, Mr Marshall owned a bungalow and a pig-holding. He wanted to sell the bungalow to James Ladd for £2,500 but was in some difficulty because his local council had ruled that the most he could sell it for was £1,500. After some interesting events—including Ladd putting down a £50 deposit and counting out 10 bundles of £100 in notes on the carpet under the table—Marshall took the property off the market. Litigation loomed as Ladd sought to recover his £1,000.

At the first instance trial, Marshall denied any knowledge of the £1,000 and, with Mrs Marshall suffering from a distinct lack of clarity about what happened that night, Ladd failed to convince the judge of the existence of the transaction. But then the Marshalls fell out, divorced and Mrs Marshall’s memory improved enormously. So it was that Ladd took his claim to the Court of Appeal and gave Denning LJ the opportunity to establish, in Ladd v Marshall [1954] 3 All

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll