header-logo header-logo

16 October 2026 / Ian McDougall
Issue: 8181 / Categories: Opinion , Artificial intelligence , Liability , Technology , Consumer , Tort
printer mail-detail

Keep calm & apply the law

261516
© Getty images

Established legal principles already hold most of the answers to AI liability, argues Ian McDougall

In 1865, Parliament, alarmed by steam traction engines on the public roads, passed the Locomotives Act. It required a person to walk 60 yards ahead of any self-propelled vehicle carrying a red flag, and limited speed to four miles an hour in the country and two in town. The Red Flag Act survived until 1896. We laugh now, but that foolishness rested on an assumption we still make, namely that something new must need new law.

I find that assumption increasingly wearying. When the internet arrived, we were assured that cyberspace lay beyond the reach of settled law, and then Godfrey v Demon Internet Ltd, in 1999, resolved a dispute over an online posting with the ordinary law of defamation. Judge Frank Easterbrook had already warned, in 1996, that there was no more need for a ‘law of cyberspace’ than for a ‘law of the horse’. Horses produced sales, injuries

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll