header-logo header-logo

06 December 2007
Issue: 7300 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

KEEP YOUR HAIR ON

In brief

Wigs in courts could be here to stay after a Bar Council survey showed overwhelming support for their retention for barristers in civil and family cases. The survey was carried out after the lord chief justice’s announcement in July that court dress worn by judges sitting in civil and family cases would be changed in January 2008. Judges sitting in these cases will wear a newly designed gown, but no wigs. The Bar Council received over 2,700 responses. Support for retention of the current full court dress was strongest for the higher courts (House of Lords, 64%), although 47% of respondents said it should also stay in the county court.

Issue: 7300 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll