header-logo header-logo

25 October 2013 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7581 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Keeping the peace

Richard Scorer discusses the heated issue of kettling

The exercise of police powers in relation to the containment of demonstrators (kettling) has been examined in a number of legal claims. These cases relate to situations where the police, believing a breach of peace to be imminent, have contained demonstrators in holding pens. The legality of this tactic then falls to be determined by the courts.

Liberty

Article 5 of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) provides a right not to be deprived of liberty except in well-defined situations. It is an absolute right, and hence, on the face of it, containment of demonstrators will be in breach of Art 5. Previous court decisions have confirmed that kettling may be lawful in exceptional circumstances, but must only be done in the face of an imminent breach of the peace, must be done in good faith, must be proportionate and must be done for no longer than is reasonably necessary. Absent these conditions, the tactic is likely to be unlawful and the police may then

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll