header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 163, Issue 7581

25 October 2013
IN THIS ISSUE

Masco Corp and other companies v European Commission T-378/10, [2013] All ER (D) 130 (Oct)

Christopher Stephens charts the move towards a new & improved judiciary

John McMullen investigates the differing interpretations of collective bargaining

Richard Scorer discusses the heated issue of kettling

Concurrent registration trumps adverse possession says Brie Stevens-Hoare QC

ADR in property disputes is a new way to solve an old problem proposes Mair Coombes Davies

Nicholas Stewart QC & Max Cole on the risks of contempt of court applications

Does the “married couples only” rule count as direct or indirect discrimination asks Robert Wintemute

The courts have muddied the water with their approach to limitation in professional liability cases, says Tim Hirst

R (on the application of Buck) v Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council [2013] EWCA Civ 1190, [2013] All ER (D) 71 (Oct)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sharpe Pritchard—Victoria Heald-Barraclough

Sharpe Pritchard—Victoria Heald-Barraclough

Magic Circle hire strengthens Sharpe Pritchard’s infrastructure finance capability

Lewis Silkin—Iskander Fernandez

Lewis Silkin—Iskander Fernandez

Lewis Silkin adds corporate crime specialist to growing dispute resolution team

Morr & Co—Michael Charalambous

Morr & Co—Michael Charalambous

Morr Co strengthens private client team with partner appointment

NEWS
Should every solicitor found to have acted dishonestly face automatic striking off? The answer, argues John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke LLP in NLJ this week, is no 
Winning an arbitral award against a state is one thing; enforcing it is another
Can government success in court tell us whether the rule of law is healthy? 
Poorly drafted dispute resolution clauses can trigger litigation before the real dispute is even addressed
As cryptocurrency becomes mainstream, family lawyers are increasingly confronting the challenges it creates on divorce
back-to-top-scroll