header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
25 October 2013 / Christopher Stephens
Issue: 7581 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Raising the benchmark

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
comment_stephens

Christopher Stephens charts the move towards a new & improved judiciary
The Crime and Courts Act 2013 (CCA 2013) and its supporting regulations include a number of measures to improve further transparency and efficiency in the judicial appointments process and also to increase judicial diversity. The changes are in four main areas: working arrangements for judges; new selection processes; the make-up of selection panels; and the composition of the JAC Commissioners.

None of the changes alters the fundamental principle of selecting judges on merit. Maintaining public confidence in the quality and independence of our judiciary remains paramount.

Working arrangements for judges

Flexible working is available in many areas of the judiciary, particularly in tribunals, and through CCA 2013 flexible working has now been extended to the High Court and above for the first time. The Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) is currently running a High Court selection process which offers flexible working. We hope that over time the opportunity to work flexibly will become widely available. The JAC has argued for some time that flexible

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll