header-logo header-logo

Competing rights

25 October 2013 / John McMullen
Issue: 7581 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

John McMullen investigates the differing interpretations of collective bargaining

Under the European Union Acquired Rights Directive (2001/23), upon a transfer of an undertaking, all of the transferors’ rights and obligations arising from a contract of employment or from an employment relationship are transferred to the transferee (Art 3(1)). Furthermore, following the transfer, the transferee is obliged to continue to observe terms and conditions agreed in any collective agreement until the date of termination or expiry of the agreement or the entering into force or application of another collective agreement (Art 3(3)).

These provisions are transposed in the UK by the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (TUPE) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246). Regulation 4 of TUPE 2006 (formerly reg 5 of TUPE 1981) provides for the transfer of the employment contract. Regulation 5 of TUPE 2006 (formerly reg 6 of TUPE 1981) provides for the transfer of collective agreements. However, that is without prejudice to the position in UK law that collective agreements are presumed to be unenforceable. But in the UK, terms from a collective agreement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll