header-logo header-logo

25 October 2013 / John McMullen
Issue: 7581 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Competing rights

John McMullen investigates the differing interpretations of collective bargaining

Under the European Union Acquired Rights Directive (2001/23), upon a transfer of an undertaking, all of the transferors’ rights and obligations arising from a contract of employment or from an employment relationship are transferred to the transferee (Art 3(1)). Furthermore, following the transfer, the transferee is obliged to continue to observe terms and conditions agreed in any collective agreement until the date of termination or expiry of the agreement or the entering into force or application of another collective agreement (Art 3(3)).

These provisions are transposed in the UK by the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (TUPE) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246). Regulation 4 of TUPE 2006 (formerly reg 5 of TUPE 1981) provides for the transfer of the employment contract. Regulation 5 of TUPE 2006 (formerly reg 6 of TUPE 1981) provides for the transfer of collective agreements. However, that is without prejudice to the position in UK law that collective agreements are presumed to be unenforceable. But in the UK, terms from a collective agreement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll