header-logo header-logo

Europe

25 October 2013
Issue: 7581 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Masco Corp and other companies v European Commission T-378/10, [2013] All ER (D) 130 (Oct)

Article 101(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) prohibited agreements and concerted practices between undertakings which had an anti-competitive object or effect and which might affect trade between member states. An infringement of Art 101(1) TFEU might result not only from isolated agreements or concerted practices which fell to be penalised as separate infringements, but also from a series of acts or from continuous conduct, the components of which might therefore justifiably be considered to be constituent elements of a single infringement. So far as concerned, in the first place, the finding of a single infringement, it was for the Commission to establish that the agreements or concerted practices in issue, although they related to distinct goods, services or territories, formed part of an overall plan knowingly implemented by the undertakings in question with a view to achieving a single anti-competitive objective. As regards, in the second place, the finding that an undertaking had participated in a single

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll