header-logo header-logo

25 October 2013
Issue: 7581 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Europe

Masco Corp and other companies v European Commission T-378/10, [2013] All ER (D) 130 (Oct)

Article 101(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) prohibited agreements and concerted practices between undertakings which had an anti-competitive object or effect and which might affect trade between member states. An infringement of Art 101(1) TFEU might result not only from isolated agreements or concerted practices which fell to be penalised as separate infringements, but also from a series of acts or from continuous conduct, the components of which might therefore justifiably be considered to be constituent elements of a single infringement. So far as concerned, in the first place, the finding of a single infringement, it was for the Commission to establish that the agreements or concerted practices in issue, although they related to distinct goods, services or territories, formed part of an overall plan knowingly implemented by the undertakings in question with a view to achieving a single anti-competitive objective. As regards, in the second place, the finding that an undertaking had participated in a single

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll