header-logo header-logo

25 October 2013 / Mair Coombes Davies
Issue: 7581 / Categories: Features , Property , ADR
printer mail-detail

A fresh approach

istock_000013546128medium

ADR in property disputes is a new way to solve an old problem proposes Mair Coombes Davies

There is nothing quite like an argument over who owns the last 6 inches of land to bring out the fighting spirit. It and other property disputes have tested the skills of some of the most astute minds in law and arbitration.

For example, in 1559 Sir Robert Dudley and Sir William Cordell, Master of the Rolls, were appointed by the court to arbitrate between three heiresses to Edward Griffith’s landed estate in Caernarfonshire and Anglesey and the male heir in a dispute which had festered for some six years (“Disputes and settlements in Medieval Wales: the role of Arbitration”, English Historical Review No.CCCCXXI October 1991). However, by 7 December 1559 the parties had entered into recognisances binding themselves to “stande, to obey and bide the awarde, order, judgement and dome” of the two arbitrators. Despite their efforts towards “a loving and friendly end”, the arbitrators found the disputants “so precisely addicted and bent to their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll