header-logo header-logo

01 September 2023 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 8038 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law , Human rights , Public
printer mail-detail

Keeping politics out of the law

135280
Political power needs constitutional restraints: Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC discusses the need for checks & balances on parliamentary sovereignty

‘Be you never so high, the law is above you.’ I can still recall the inimitable voice of Lord Denning enunciating this favourite motto, attributed to Thomas Fuller in 1732. The supremacy of law is necessary for the effective management of a modern democracy. Governments are bound by the law, as is everyone else.

But what is the law? Lord Denning would have seen it as a web of rules and principles derived from statute and from the accumulated wisdom of the judges. It includes the common law as well as statute law and subordinate legislation authorised by statute. As interpreters of the law, the judges are also lawmakers. Parliament, however, can always assert its will over the judges by using its legislative power. Or can it?

Absolute supremacy?

Governments are unhappy when, as they see it, judges frustrate measures that politicians believe they are pursuing for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll