header-logo header-logo

Keeping in touch with the future

13 April 2018 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7788 / Categories: Opinion , Technology
printer mail-detail
nlj_7788_smith

Artificial intelligence, Big Law & cyber security. Roger Smith shares his takeaways from the British Legal Technology Forum

The British Legal Technology Forum 2018 filled the historic Billingsgate Market on London’s Thames to the gunnels last month. Around 1,200 delegates crowded in around a main stage, three subsidiary ones and exhibition space to get an update on latest developments. And Professor Richard Susskind, the guru of law’s future, curated a fitting line-up to meet their expectations. Long gone are the sceptics who argued that the legal profession would escape from the technological revolution pretty well unscathed: they have joined the cottage weavers and other deniers of history. But, the question of how it will impact is still open.

Perhaps the most telling element in the day was that hardly any speaker spoke of technological disruption of the market. There was none of the sense of angst that you can find, for example, at similar American conferences that the barbarians—in the form of unregulated providers of legal advice—might be lurking at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll