header-logo header-logo

13 April 2018 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7788 / Categories: Opinion , Technology
printer mail-detail

Keeping in touch with the future

nlj_7788_smith

Artificial intelligence, Big Law & cyber security. Roger Smith shares his takeaways from the British Legal Technology Forum

The British Legal Technology Forum 2018 filled the historic Billingsgate Market on London’s Thames to the gunnels last month. Around 1,200 delegates crowded in around a main stage, three subsidiary ones and exhibition space to get an update on latest developments. And Professor Richard Susskind, the guru of law’s future, curated a fitting line-up to meet their expectations. Long gone are the sceptics who argued that the legal profession would escape from the technological revolution pretty well unscathed: they have joined the cottage weavers and other deniers of history. But, the question of how it will impact is still open.

Perhaps the most telling element in the day was that hardly any speaker spoke of technological disruption of the market. There was none of the sense of angst that you can find, for example, at similar American conferences that the barbarians—in the form of unregulated providers of legal advice—might be lurking at the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll