header-logo header-logo

The knowledge question

19 March 2009 / Andrew Buchan
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

Will employers pay the price for passive smoking in the workplace? Andrew Buchan reports

* * * * * *

The first studies into injury caused by passive smoking date back to 1982 and involve the link between smoking and cancer for non-smokers living with a smoker. These showed an increased risk to health and were followed by obfuscation and denials of the link by the tobacco industry.

In 1993 the US Environmental Protection Agency published a comprehensive report in which, having reviewed 30 epidemiological studies, found a positive association of passive smoking and lung cancer and classified environmental tobacco smoke as a known human carcinogen. In 1994 air hostesses in Florida were allowed to bring an action against the Phillip Morris tobacco companies for “second-hand smoke”. This case is reported to have settled for £300m in 1996.

Second-hand smoke

A 1997 BMJ editorial entitled “Passive Smoking: History Repeats Itself” sets out the advice from the Royal College of Physicians going back to 1962 warning of the risks associated with passive smoking. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll