header-logo header-logo

10 October 2024
Issue: 8090 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals , Equality
printer mail-detail

Labour’s Bill on employment rights strikes positive notes with lawyers

Lawyers have broadly welcomed the Employment Rights Bill, but warned of some unintended consequences

The Bill, introduced this week, creates a right to paternity and parental leave and protection from unfair dismissal from the first day in the job. It strengthens flexible working rights and introduces a right to bereavement leave from day one, bans most zero-hours contracts, and aims to end the practice of ‘fire and rehire’ whereby employers terminate contracts and re-recruit employees on less favourable terms.

It introduces a statutory probation period for new employees—the government proposes nine months’ probation, but will consult on the length.

The Bill also strengthens statutory sick pay, removing the lower earnings limit and cutting out the waiting period before sick pay begins.

Francesca Lopez (pictured), senior associate, employment, Kingsley Napley, said: ‘The radical changes to UK employment law which Labour promised are now well and truly underway.

‘These changes are laudable—there is no dispute about that—but they do have potentially serious unintended consequences. Will the day one rights to claim unfair dismissal mean that some employers will steer away from recruiting candidates that are not the obvious “right fit” for the role? Discrimination legislation continues to provide protection but will increased caution make it harder for candidates that are younger/older, have less relevant experience, have been on a career break, require more training/supervision or have childcare/caring responsibilities to get jobs?

‘All workers will be entitled to flexible working by default and employers will have to accommodate requests “as far as reasonable”. But how will reasonableness be assessed? No guidance has been provided as yet, and without it, businesses may struggle to apply the changes in context and/or face increased litigation if they refuse requests.’

Lopez said the proposals ‘undoubtedly increase the chance of employment disputes, when the changes come into effect in two years’ time, and employers need to brace themselves accordingly’.

Elizabeth Watt, employment solicitor, WSP Solicitors, offered reassurance for employers, emphasising not only that the reforms may not come into force for ‘years’ but that ‘increasing statutory sick pay and maternity and paternity pay will impose no additional cost to their company.

‘As in the current system, all statutory pay is paid by government’.

Extra costs for employers could arise, however, in the shape of the human resources processes that will need to be reviewed, implemented and updated, Watt said. ‘There will be lots of contractual changes that businesses will need to consider, which could cost some companies thousands.’

On potential tribunal claims, Watt said: ‘The Bill could lessen tribunal claims thanks to having a clearer piece of legislation in place however, countering this argument is the new Workers Protection Act, which comes into law on 26 October and could open the floodgates to a surge in tribunal claims.’

Anna Dabek, partner, Anthony Collins, noted that the proposals ‘stopped short of an outright ban on zero hours contracts.

‘Workers on low hours contracts will be given the right to request predictable hours if they have worked a period of regular hours. This enables those workers who chose to remain on zero hours contracts the option to do so. The government has made room for choice, which is vital for sectors like health and social care for whom zero-hour contracts are a bed-rock for staff supply.’

Issue: 8090 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Trowers & Hamlins—Rahul Sagar

Trowers & Hamlins—Rahul Sagar

Banking and finance practice bolstered by partner hire

mfg Solicitors—Ian Sheppard

mfg Solicitors—Ian Sheppard

Commercial litigation team welcomes senior associate in Birmingham

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll