header-logo header-logo

Lacking teeth?

28 April 2011 / Alexander Bastin , Michelle Stevens-hoare
Issue: 7463 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Is the Party Wall Act a statutory damp squib? Michelle Stevens-Hoare & Alexander Bastin investigate

Most solicitors specialising in property litigation have fielded a call from a client with a neighbour embarking on party wall works without reference toyour client or the procedures under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 (the Act).
Assuming no damage has yet been done, do you have a difficulty in such a situation because the Act does not expressly require use of the Act’s procedure, or provide a remedy for failure to do so?

An anxious client is likely to want to stop the neighbour’s activities and will not thank you for advising them to wait until damage is done. If the neighbour will not co-operate, your client will want an injunction. However, to seek an injunction you need to identify a cause of action. There will often be a clear common law claim such as in nuisance (ie, noise, dust, vibration), trespass, negligence or for interference with a right of support.

However, there will not always be a common

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll