header-logo header-logo

Lacking teeth?

28 April 2011 / Alexander Bastin , Michelle Stevens-hoare
Issue: 7463 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Is the Party Wall Act a statutory damp squib? Michelle Stevens-Hoare & Alexander Bastin investigate

Most solicitors specialising in property litigation have fielded a call from a client with a neighbour embarking on party wall works without reference toyour client or the procedures under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 (the Act).
Assuming no damage has yet been done, do you have a difficulty in such a situation because the Act does not expressly require use of the Act’s procedure, or provide a remedy for failure to do so?

An anxious client is likely to want to stop the neighbour’s activities and will not thank you for advising them to wait until damage is done. If the neighbour will not co-operate, your client will want an injunction. However, to seek an injunction you need to identify a cause of action. There will often be a clear common law claim such as in nuisance (ie, noise, dust, vibration), trespass, negligence or for interference with a right of support.

However, there will not always be a common

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll