header-logo header-logo

28 April 2011 / Alexander Bastin , Michelle Stevens-hoare
Issue: 7463 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Lacking teeth?

Is the Party Wall Act a statutory damp squib? Michelle Stevens-Hoare & Alexander Bastin investigate

Most solicitors specialising in property litigation have fielded a call from a client with a neighbour embarking on party wall works without reference toyour client or the procedures under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 (the Act).
Assuming no damage has yet been done, do you have a difficulty in such a situation because the Act does not expressly require use of the Act’s procedure, or provide a remedy for failure to do so?

An anxious client is likely to want to stop the neighbour’s activities and will not thank you for advising them to wait until damage is done. If the neighbour will not co-operate, your client will want an injunction. However, to seek an injunction you need to identify a cause of action. There will often be a clear common law claim such as in nuisance (ie, noise, dust, vibration), trespass, negligence or for interference with a right of support.

However, there will not always be a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll