header-logo header-logo

28 November 2008 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Opinion , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A lame duck?

Alistair Darling and the Pre Budget Report proved to be a disappointing combination, says Peter Vaines

I was asked to write a light-hearted piece about the Pre Budget Report—but as we are dealing with Mr Brown, Mr Darling and a global catastrophe, light hearts are rather hard to come by. Faint hearts perhaps—but please not from the chancellor.

We all thought this would be a Budget with a difference—like he was going to reduce taxes. Except that this time his proposals have to work. No more sound bites or playing to the gallery…this is really serious. The economy needs TLC like never before. And Mr Darling Brown (I never can tell which) is the man to do it.

Dream on. Could anybody with any appreciation of the situation, or the mood, have said with a straight face that it’s OK because everything is going to be back in balance by the year 2016!

However, the chancellor did announce some tax cuts, although that is perhaps an odd description because most of the changes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime specialist joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll