header-logo header-logo

28 November 2008 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Opinion , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A lame duck?

Alistair Darling and the Pre Budget Report proved to be a disappointing combination, says Peter Vaines

I was asked to write a light-hearted piece about the Pre Budget Report—but as we are dealing with Mr Brown, Mr Darling and a global catastrophe, light hearts are rather hard to come by. Faint hearts perhaps—but please not from the chancellor.

We all thought this would be a Budget with a difference—like he was going to reduce taxes. Except that this time his proposals have to work. No more sound bites or playing to the gallery…this is really serious. The economy needs TLC like never before. And Mr Darling Brown (I never can tell which) is the man to do it.

Dream on. Could anybody with any appreciation of the situation, or the mood, have said with a straight face that it’s OK because everything is going to be back in balance by the year 2016!

However, the chancellor did announce some tax cuts, although that is perhaps an odd description because most of the changes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll