header-logo header-logo

03 December 2025
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Lammy's overhaul of jury trials 'goes too far', say lawyers

Criminal defence lawyers have expressed dismay at the Lord Chancellor David Lammy’s plans to reduce the backlog by scaling back jury trials to murder, rape, homicide and other indictable crimes where the sentence is three years or more

Magistrates’ sentencing powers will be increased from one year to 18 months, and could be extended to 24 months if necessary.

Lammy’s plans, delivered in Parliament this week, build on Sir Brian Leveson’s Independent Review of the Criminal Courts. While Sir Brian proposed an extra court tier where a judge sits alongside two magistrates, Lammy plans to introduce a judge-only ‘swift’ court.

Law Society vice president Brett Dixon said the government’s proposals ‘go too far in eroding our fundamental right to be judged by a jury of our own peers.

‘Allowing a single judge, operating in an under resourced system, to decide guilt in a serious and potentially life changing case is a dramatic departure from our shared values.’

The latest government figures for April to June 2025 showed 78,329 outstanding cases in the Crown Court and 361,027 in the magistrates’ court. Lammy told MPs the backlog is projected to rise above 100,000 cases.

However, David Corker, consultant at Corker Binning, said the government should have adopted the Canadian and Australian model in serious fraud cases of giving the accused ‘the right to choose to be tried by a judge or by a jury.

‘Defendants in complex cases in those jurisdictions predominantly opt for the former, and having done so, the outcomes attract their and the public’s confidence’.

Mark Jones, partner at Payne Hicks Beach, said: ‘Court delays stem from long-term underfunding, not juries.

‘If the government is serious about reducing the backlog, it must invest in the justice system rather than weaken a defendant’s right to elect to be judged by their peers.’

Matthew Hardcastle, partner at Kingsley Napley, said: ‘The continued “silver-bullet” and headline driven approach to change is deeply disappointing.

‘Changing some aspects of the criminal justice system will not magically solve systemic issues.’

Lammy also pledged an extra £550m over three years for specialist support services for victims and witnesses. 

Issue: 8142 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll