header-logo header-logo

Land—Adverse possession—Requirements

24 November 2011
Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Zarb and another v Parry and another [2011] EWCA Civ 1306,[2011] All ER (D) 100 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Neuberger MR, Arden & Jackson LJJ, 15 November 2011

In order to defeat a claim to title to land by adverse possession under the Land Registration Act 2002 on the basis of an interruption which stopped time running, the paper title owner must show possession to the exclusion of the person claiming adverse possession.

Laura Collignon (instructed by Child & Child) for the claimants. Christian Sweeney (instructed by Lyons Davidson, Bristol) for the defendants.

The proceedings concerned a strip of land forming part of the garden of the defendants. The claimants were their neighbours. They had lived there since July 2005, having acquired the property in September 2000 following the death of the previous owner, L. In 1992, L had sold a portion of the garden to the defendants’ predecessor. The transaction was recorded in a transfer dated 14 December 1992, and had an attached plan, known as Plan B. The defendants purchased

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll