header-logo header-logo

Land—Adverse possession—Requirements

24 November 2011
Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Zarb and another v Parry and another [2011] EWCA Civ 1306,[2011] All ER (D) 100 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Neuberger MR, Arden & Jackson LJJ, 15 November 2011

In order to defeat a claim to title to land by adverse possession under the Land Registration Act 2002 on the basis of an interruption which stopped time running, the paper title owner must show possession to the exclusion of the person claiming adverse possession.

Laura Collignon (instructed by Child & Child) for the claimants. Christian Sweeney (instructed by Lyons Davidson, Bristol) for the defendants.

The proceedings concerned a strip of land forming part of the garden of the defendants. The claimants were their neighbours. They had lived there since July 2005, having acquired the property in September 2000 following the death of the previous owner, L. In 1992, L had sold a portion of the garden to the defendants’ predecessor. The transaction was recorded in a transfer dated 14 December 1992, and had an attached plan, known as Plan B. The defendants purchased

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll