header-logo header-logo

Landlord & tenant

23 June 2011
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Crown Estate Commissioners v Governors of Peabody Trust and another [2011] EWHC 1467 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 63 (Jun)

Prior to the Housing Act 1988, the principle was well established that if the landlord changed, the tenant was only entitled to the form of tenancy, and security which the new landlord was capable of offering. The literal effect of s 38(5)(d) of the 1988 Act was as follows. Upon the claimant transferring its interest as landlord to another landlord, then the regulated tenants become assured tenants. That was because s 38(1) and (3) of the 1988 Act applied and had the effect of disapplying para 1 of Sch 1 to the 1988 Act.

Accordingly, instead, s 1 of the 1988 Act applied and meant that the tenancies became assured tenancies and could not be protected or housing association tenancies. This was the case even if the new landlord was a private landlord capable of being the grantor of a regulated tenancy pursuant to the Rent Act 1977.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll