header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 161, Issue 7471

23 June 2011
IN THIS ISSUE
March of the big brand Premium Content

In his final article on deregulation, Jon Robins focuses on enterprising entrants to the legal services market

24 June 2011 / Dr Jon Robins
Courting change Premium Content

Peter Causton muses over the future of the litigation landscape

24 June 2011 / Peter Causton
Gone but not forgotten Premium Content

Do employers owe a duty of care to ex-employees, ask Michael Salter
& Chris Bryden

24 June 2011 / Michael Salter / Chris Bryden
Under new rule (6) Premium Content

Geraldine Morris considers whether the options for financial relief in family proceedings are on the right track

23 June 2011 / Geraldine Morris
Loud & clear? Premium Content

Robert O’Leary outlines the impact of Baker v Quantum Clothing Group

23 June 2011 / Robert O'Leary
Class action Premium Content

Susan Nash navigates the latest human rights twists & turns

23 June 2011 / Susan Nash
Humble opinions Premium Content

Expert evidence must distinguish fact from opinion, says David Smith

23 June 2011 / David Smith
Mediation’s moment Premium Content

James South predicts that the demand for mediation is about to soar

23 June 2011 / James South
To sue or not to sue? Premium Content

Ekaterina Sjostrand analyses the main principles of the jurisdiction of English courts in Russia/CIS related disputes

23 June 2011 / Ekaterina Sjostrand
Fisheries—Levy—Scope and lawfulness Premium Content

Bloomsbury International Ltd and others v Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Sea Fish Industry Authority intervening) [2011] UKSC 25, [2011] All ER (D) 91 (Jun)

23 June 2011
Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll