header-logo header-logo

Under new rule (6)

23 June 2011 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Geraldine Morris considers whether the options for financial relief in family proceedings are on the right track

Practitioners are likely by now to have started to experience the changes introduced by the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010). In relation to financial orders (ancillary relief as was) the majority of the relevant procedural provisions can be found in FPR 2010, Pt 9 and the linked practice direction (PD) 9A. However, a feature of the new rules is that no application to the court, whether financial or children related, can be looked at in isolation. The overarching principles either introduced or cemented by the rules will impact on financial orders as much as any other. Key provisions to take into account are:

 

  • Terminology—the glossary to the FPR 2010 isn’t particularly enlightening (most practitioners will surely know the meaning of “affidavit”) but it is clear from the rules themselves that an attempt has been made to modernise the terminology which in the case of financial proceedings is marked by a shift from the slightly antiquated
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll