header-logo header-logo

Courting change

24 June 2011 / Peter Causton
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Peter Causton muses over the future of the litigation landscape

Hard on the heels of the Jackson and Young reviews and proposed cuts to the ambit of legal aid, comes another consultation from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ): Solving Disputes in the County Courts: Creating a simpler, quicker and more proportionate system, the responses to which are due in by the end of the month. In addition, the white paper dealing with the implementation of the Jackson reforms was published this week and it is unclear how the changes proposed in the consultation will tie in with this, or how all these ambitious changes will be funded.

If implemented, the proposals outlined in the consultation are likely to be a “double-whammy” for litigators already dealing with the changes to litigation funding being pushed through, including irrecoverability of the conditional fees arrangements uplift, and after-the-event insurance premiums. It is very difficult at this stage to predict exactly what the litigation landscape will look like in five years time.

It is clear from the consultation that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll