header-logo header-logo

Courting change

24 June 2011 / Peter Causton
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Peter Causton muses over the future of the litigation landscape

Hard on the heels of the Jackson and Young reviews and proposed cuts to the ambit of legal aid, comes another consultation from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ): Solving Disputes in the County Courts: Creating a simpler, quicker and more proportionate system, the responses to which are due in by the end of the month. In addition, the white paper dealing with the implementation of the Jackson reforms was published this week and it is unclear how the changes proposed in the consultation will tie in with this, or how all these ambitious changes will be funded.

If implemented, the proposals outlined in the consultation are likely to be a “double-whammy” for litigators already dealing with the changes to litigation funding being pushed through, including irrecoverability of the conditional fees arrangements uplift, and after-the-event insurance premiums. It is very difficult at this stage to predict exactly what the litigation landscape will look like in five years time.

It is clear from the consultation that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll