header-logo header-logo

Gone but not forgotten

Do employers owe a duty of care to ex-employees, ask Michael Salter
& Chris Bryden

Implied into every contract of employment is a mutual duty of trust and confidence between the employer and the employee. One aspect of this duty is that where an employer agrees to provide a reference for their employee such reference will be fair and reasonable. A breach of the duty of mutual trust and confidence will entitle that employee to resign and claim constructive dismissal.

Obligations to ex-employees

The ending of an employment relationship does not necessarily mean that the ex-employer’s obligations to their ex-employee have ended. For instance an ex-employer is likewise not obliged to give a reference for an ex-employee. However in many situations, one will be provided. There are risks however in so doing, even after the ending of the employment relationship. Readers will be familiar with the House of Lords’ decision in Spring v Guardian Assurance plc    [1994] 3 All ER 129, [1994] ICR 596, where their lordships,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll