header-logo header-logo

Humble opinions

23 June 2011 / David Smith
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Expert evidence must distinguish fact from opinion, says David Smith

There is an important distinction made between types of evidence in England and Wales—witness evidence that relates to fact and evidence that relates to opinion. The first is admissible while the second is not. The distinction is often hard to spot.

In truth, all evidence is opinion evidence to some extent in that the same events may appear to occur in an entirely different manner due to a difference in the way they recall or interpret the events, or because of a conscious or unconscious bias. The court resolves this problem by grouping issues of interpretation and bias under the general heading of witness credibility.

Opinion v fact

For example, a passenger in a car cannot give factual evidence about the speed that the car is travelling unless they have actually looked at the speedometer. They can give factual evidence about how frequently lampposts were passing the windows and as to how the car was moving in relation to other vehicles on the road,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll