header-logo header-logo

To sue or not to sue?

23 June 2011 / Ekaterina Sjostrand
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Ekaterina Sjostrand analyses the main principles of the jurisdiction of English courts in Russia/CIS related disputes

England having become a popular dispute resolution forum for Russia and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) related cases in the past decade or so, the High Court in London has seen an influx of various matters connected, one way or another, to the former Soviet states. In many such cases, it is the origin of the actual parties which bears this connection, and/or the origin of the assets at the heart of the dispute, and/or the origin of the ultimate owners of the assets. In different “scenarios” different conflict of laws rules will apply as regards the courts’ jurisdiction.

The most significant cases giving rise to landmark decisions involved the famous “oligarchs”. In almost all of them challenges to jurisdiction of English Courts ended up in long fierce legal battles. They dealt with various difficult legal issues such as personal service, domicile, criteria for grant of permission to serve out of jurisdiction including “forum conveniens”.

Domicile

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll