header-logo header-logo

To sue or not to sue?

23 June 2011 / Ekaterina Sjostrand
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Ekaterina Sjostrand analyses the main principles of the jurisdiction of English courts in Russia/CIS related disputes

England having become a popular dispute resolution forum for Russia and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) related cases in the past decade or so, the High Court in London has seen an influx of various matters connected, one way or another, to the former Soviet states. In many such cases, it is the origin of the actual parties which bears this connection, and/or the origin of the assets at the heart of the dispute, and/or the origin of the ultimate owners of the assets. In different “scenarios” different conflict of laws rules will apply as regards the courts’ jurisdiction.

The most significant cases giving rise to landmark decisions involved the famous “oligarchs”. In almost all of them challenges to jurisdiction of English Courts ended up in long fierce legal battles. They dealt with various difficult legal issues such as personal service, domicile, criteria for grant of permission to serve out of jurisdiction including “forum conveniens”.

Domicile

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll