header-logo header-logo

23 June 2011 / Robert O'Leary
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Loud & clear?

Robert O’Leary outlines the impact of Baker v Quantum Clothing Group

In the first industrial deafness case to reach the Supreme Court—Baker v Quantum Clothing Group and others [2011] UKSC 17, [2011] All ER (D) 137 (Apr)—the court found in favour of the appellant employers by a majority of 3:2. In the process, the long-standing Court of Appeal authority on the interpretation of the Factories Act 1961 (FaA 1961), s 29, Larner v British Steel [1993] 4 All ER 102, [1993] ICR 551 was overruled. The decision could potentially have a marked impact on personal injury claims.

Section 29

Section 29 of FaA 1961, provides that “every place at which any person has at any time to work…shall, so far as is reasonably practicable, be made and kept safe for any person working there”.
The appellants argued that s 29 applied only to the structure and fabric of factory premises and not to processes carried on there. Noise, it was argued, required someone to be exposed for many years to suffer material injury.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll