header-logo header-logo

Loud & clear?

23 June 2011 / Robert O'Leary
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Robert O’Leary outlines the impact of Baker v Quantum Clothing Group

In the first industrial deafness case to reach the Supreme Court—Baker v Quantum Clothing Group and others [2011] UKSC 17, [2011] All ER (D) 137 (Apr)—the court found in favour of the appellant employers by a majority of 3:2. In the process, the long-standing Court of Appeal authority on the interpretation of the Factories Act 1961 (FaA 1961), s 29, Larner v British Steel [1993] 4 All ER 102, [1993] ICR 551 was overruled. The decision could potentially have a marked impact on personal injury claims.

Section 29

Section 29 of FaA 1961, provides that “every place at which any person has at any time to work…shall, so far as is reasonably practicable, be made and kept safe for any person working there”.
The appellants argued that s 29 applied only to the structure and fabric of factory premises and not to processes carried on there. Noise, it was argued, required someone to be exposed for many years to suffer material injury.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll