header-logo header-logo

24 June 2011 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

March of the big brand

In his final article on deregulation, Jon Robins focuses on enterprising entrants to the legal services market

When Theo Paphitis and Deborah Meaden turn their attentions to the dusty world of legal services, it’s probably worth checking out. Smarta.com, founded by the social media entrepreneur Sháá Wasmund with the support of the two Dragons, last month announced that they were to partner with RBS and Natwest to launch a legal service aimed at small and medium-sized businesses under its “Smarta Business Builder” banner. “I’m not just proud to recommend Smarta Business Builder, I’m suggesting that all small businesses use it too,” enthused Theo on the press release.

Making legal services affordable to cash-strapped start-up businesses is a compelling prospect. RBS also runs Mentor, a regulatory compliance service for 14,000 businesses, and RiskRemedy, an online self-service employment law and health and safety compliance package also aimed at the SME market.

Opportunity knocks

John Muncey, head of Mentor, sees deregulation of legal services as a “huge opportunity” for RBS and reckons

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll