header-logo header-logo

10 December 2019
Issue: 7868 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Landmark adoption decision

A couple whose wish to adopt was rebuffed because of their Indian heritage have won their discrimination claim

Adopt Berkshire declined to progress Sandeep and Reena Mander’s application on the basis they only had white British pre-school children available, already had a surfeit of white British pre-approved prospective adopters and priority would be given to white couples. The agency suggested they adopt a child from India.

Ruling in Mander & Mander v Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead at Oxford County Court, Judge Melissa Clarke held that the couple were discriminated against on the grounds of race. She awarded them general damages of £29,000 and special damages of £60,000 damages for the cost of adopting overseas. The couple have now adopted a child from the US.

The council said it always put the interests of the child first and would review its policies.

Issue: 7868 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll