header-logo header-logo

16 September 2010 / Azmina Gulamhusein
Issue: 7433 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

The last great taboo

Azmina Gulamhusein examines employers’ attitudes to mental illness

It is estimated that one in four persons will experience a mental health problem at some point in their lives and the economic crisis has led to a significant increase in work-related stress, depression and anxiety. For example, the charity LawCare (which provides a pastoral care service for lawyers) reported that 2009 was its busiest year ever and there was a 10% rise in the number of callers to its helpline complaining of stress.

Although mental ill-health is widespread and a major cause of sickness absence, it remains a taboo subject in the workplace. Recent case law has highlighted the stigma that is still associated with mental illness and the difficulties in meeting the statutory definition of a disabled person. However, it is hoped that provisions in the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) due to take effect next month will provide better protection for vulnerable employees with mental health conditions.

The facts in J v DLA Piper UK LLP

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s (EAT’s) recent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll