header-logo header-logo

16 September 2010 / Azmina Gulamhusein
Issue: 7433 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

The last great taboo

Azmina Gulamhusein examines employers’ attitudes to mental illness

It is estimated that one in four persons will experience a mental health problem at some point in their lives and the economic crisis has led to a significant increase in work-related stress, depression and anxiety. For example, the charity LawCare (which provides a pastoral care service for lawyers) reported that 2009 was its busiest year ever and there was a 10% rise in the number of callers to its helpline complaining of stress.

Although mental ill-health is widespread and a major cause of sickness absence, it remains a taboo subject in the workplace. Recent case law has highlighted the stigma that is still associated with mental illness and the difficulties in meeting the statutory definition of a disabled person. However, it is hoped that provisions in the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) due to take effect next month will provide better protection for vulnerable employees with mental health conditions.

The facts in J v DLA Piper UK LLP

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s (EAT’s) recent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
Jonathan Fisher KC’s wide-ranging fraud report contains worthwhile proposals, but turning them into workable reform will require money, capacity and political will
A Court of Appeal ruling shows that a failed nuisance claim may still leave a neighbour liable in negligence where foreseeable harm could readily have been avoided
The government has stepped back from a proposed early-release exclusion limited to unlawful act manslaughter, opting instead to exclude all manslaughter sentences
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience
back-to-top-scroll